History |
Wars & Campaigns |
►Boer
War
►First
World War
►►Western
Front
►►►Trench
Warfare: 1914-1916
►►►Allied
Offensive: 1916
►►►Allied
Offensives: 1917
►►►German
Offensive: 1918
►►►Advance
to Victory: 1918
►►Siberia
►Second
World War
►►War
Against Japan
►►North
Africa
►►Italian
Campaign
►►►Sicily
►►►Southern
Italy
►►►The
Sangro and Moro
►►►Battles
of the FSSF
►►►Cassino
►►►Liri
Valley
►►►Advance
to Florence
►►►Gothic
Line
►►►Winter
Lines
►►North-West
Europe
►►►Normandy
►►►Southern
France
►►►Channel
Ports
►►►Scheldt
►►►Nijmegen
Salient
►►►Rhineland
►►►Final
Phase
►Korean
War
►Cold
War
►Gulf
War |
Operations |
|
Battle Honours |
Boer War
First World War
Western Front
Trench Warfare: 1914-1916
Allied Offensive: 1916
►Somme, 1916 |
1
Jul-18 Nov 16 |
►Albert |
.1-13
Jul 16 |
►Bazentin |
.14-17
Jul 16 |
►Pozieres |
.23
Jul-3 Sep 16 |
►Guillemont |
.3-6
Sep 16 |
►Ginchy |
.9
Sep 16 |
►Flers-Courcelette |
15-22
Sep 16 |
►Thiepval |
26-29
Sep 16 |
►Le Transloy |
.
1-18 Oct 16 |
Allied
Offensives: 1917
►Arras 1917 |
8
Apr-4 May 17 |
►Vimy, 1917 |
.9-14
Apr 17 |
►Arleux |
28-29 Apr 17 |
►Scarpe, 1917 |
.3-4
May17 |
►Hill 70 |
.15-25
Aug 17 |
►Messines, 1917 |
.7-14
Jun 17 |
►Ypres, 1917 |
..31
Jul-10 Nov 17 |
►Pilckem |
31
Jul-2 Aug 17 |
►Langemarck, 1917 |
.16-18
Aug 17 |
►Menin Road |
.20-25
Sep 17 |
►Polygon Wood |
26
Sep-3 Oct 17 |
►Broodseinde |
.4
Oct 17 |
►Poelcapelle |
.9
Oct 17 |
►Passchendaele |
.12
Oct 17 |
►Cambrai, 1917 |
20
Nov-3 Dec 17 |
German Offensive: 1918
►Somme, 1918 |
.21
Mar-5 Apr 18 |
►St. Quentin |
.21-23
Mar 18 |
►Bapaume, 1918 |
.24-25
Mar 18 |
►Rosieres |
.26-27
Mar 18 |
►Avre |
.4
Apr 18 |
►Lys |
.9-29
Apr 18 |
►Estaires |
.9-11
Apr 18 |
►Messines, 1918 |
.10-11
Apr 18 |
►Bailleul |
.13-15
Apr 18 |
►Kemmel |
.17-19
Apr 18 |
Advance to Victory: 1918
►Arras, 1918 |
.26
Aug-3 Sep 18 |
►Scarpe, 1918 |
26-30 Aug 18. |
►Drocourt-Queant |
.2-3
Sep 18 |
►Hindenburg Line |
.12
Sep-9 Oct 18 |
►Canal du Nord |
.27
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►St. Quentin Canal |
.29
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►Epehy |
3-5
Oct 18 |
►Cambrai, 1918 |
.8-9
Oct 18 |
►Valenciennes |
.1-2
Nov 18 |
►Sambre |
.4
Nov 18 |
►Pursuit to Mons |
.28 Sep-11Nov |
Second World War
War Against Japan
South-East Asia
Italian Campaign
Battle of Sicily
Southern
Italy
The Sangro and Moro
Battles of the FSSF
►Anzio |
22
Jan-22 May 44 |
►Rome |
.22
May-4 Jun 44 |
►Advance
|
.22
May-22 Jun 44 |
to the Tiber |
. |
►Monte Arrestino |
25
May 44 |
►Rocca Massima |
27
May 44 |
►Colle Ferro |
2
Jun 44 |
Cassino
►Cassino II |
11-18
May 44 |
►Gustav Line |
11-18
May 44 |
►Sant' Angelo in
|
13
May 44 |
Teodice |
. |
►Pignataro |
14-15 May 44 |
Liri Valley
►Hitler Line |
18-24 May 44 |
►Melfa Crossing |
24-25 May 44 |
►Torrice Crossroads |
30
May 44 |
Advance to Florence
Gothic Line
►Gothic Line |
25 Aug-22 Sep 44 |
►Monteciccardo |
27-28 Aug 44 |
►Point 204 (Pozzo Alto) |
31 Aug 44 |
►Borgo Santa Maria |
1 Sep 44 |
►Tomba di Pesaro |
1-2 Sep 44 |
Winter Lines
►Rimini Line |
14-21 Sep 44 |
►San Martino- |
14-18 Sep 44 |
San Lorenzo |
. |
►San Fortunato |
18-20 Sep 44 |
►Sant' Angelo |
11-15 Sep 44 |
in Salute |
. |
►Bulgaria Village |
13-14 Sep 44 |
►Pisciatello |
16-19 Sep 44 |
►Savio Bridgehead |
20-23
Sep 44 |
►Monte La Pieve |
13-19
Oct 44 |
►Monte Spaduro |
19-24 Oct 44 |
►Monte San Bartolo |
11-14
Nov 44 |
►Lamone Crossing |
2-13
Dec 44 |
►Capture of Ravenna |
3-4
Dec 44 |
►Naviglio Canal |
12-15 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Vecchio |
16-18 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Munio |
19-21 Dec 44 |
►Conventello- |
2-6 Jan 45 |
Comacchio |
. |
Northwest Europe
Battle of Normandy
►Quesnay Road |
10-11 Aug 44 |
►St. Lambert-sur- |
19-22 Aug 44 |
Southern France
Channel Ports
The Scheldt
Nijmegen Salient
Rhineland
►The
Reichswald |
8-13 Feb 45 |
►Waal
Flats |
8-15 Feb 45 |
►Moyland
Wood |
14-21 Feb 45 |
►Goch-Calcar
Road |
19-21 Feb 45 |
►The
Hochwald |
26
Feb- |
. |
4
Mar 45 |
►Veen |
6-10 Mar 45 |
►Xanten |
8-9
Mar 45 |
Final Phase
►The
Rhine |
23
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
►Emmerich-Hoch
|
28
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
Elten |
. |
Korean War
|
Domestic Missions |
►FLQ
Crisis |
International
Missions |
►ICCS
Vietnam 1973
►MFO
Sinai 1986- |
Peacekeeping |
►UNTEA |
W. N. Guinea 1963-1964 |
►ONUCA |
C. America
1989-1992 |
►UNTAC |
Cambodia
1992-1993 |
►UNMOP |
Prevlaka
1996-2001 |
|
Exercises |
|
Le Havre
Le Havre
was a Battle Honour granted to Canadian units participating in
actions at this city from 10 Sep 1944 to 12 Sep 1944, as part of the
overall battle to clear the Channel Ports. Only one Canadian unit
was involved in this battle, which was fought by I British Corps.
Background
The fall of Dieppe in early Sep 1944 brought hope that Allied
logistical concerns might be speedily remedied by the capture of
port facilities along the coast of northern France. In the first
week of Sep, then, First Canadian Army moved quickly to try and
secure several cities. Le Havre was invested by I British Corps,
while 3rd Canadian Infantry Division moved on Boulogne and Calais.
It is worthy of note, however, that administrative plans drafted by
the Allies had provided for the use of Le Havre to resupply American
forces in the field rather than First Canadian Army or British 2nd
Army.1 |
|
On 6 Sep, General Montgomery, commander of 21st Army Group asked the
commander of First Canadian Army, General H.D.G. Crerar, for an
estimate on how long the battle for Boulogne might last. Crerar was
of the opinion that capturing the channel ports was vital to the
conduct of the war, and recognized that the speedy advance by the
Allied armies away from Normandy at the end of Aug had imposed a
great logistical burden.
Approach to Battle
I British Corps had crossed the Seine in the first week of Sep, and
leading elements of the 49th (West Riding) Division made contact
with German perimeter defences on the evening of 3 Sep. A surrender
demand was rejected by the garrison the next morning by Oberst
Eberhard Wildermuth, in charge of the garrison. The German commander
had already made the harbour unserviceable and hoped the Allies
might forgo a formal siege knowing that the port would be unusable
for many months after capture.
The grand Allied plan, outlined as early as Mar 1944, had been to
capture Rouen and Le Havre at approximately D+90. The first outline
plan for Operation ASTONIA, the capture of the Le Havre, was drafted
on 3 Sep (D+89). The plan called for an assault by two infantry
divisions supported by two armoured brigades (49th Division would be
accompanied by 51st (Highland) Division, supported by 34 Tank
Brigade and 33 Armoured Brigade respectively).
Operational Plan
The Highland Division was to
move down the coast and take over the Western half of the line
and the two divisions were to continue to drive in the enemy
outposts and by vigorous patrolling intimidate him and learn
everything possible about his dispositions. If the enemy showed
any sign of weakness and presented the opportunity, penetration
of his main positions was to be made. Arrangements were made for
Naval and Air bombardment to "soften up" his defences, and to
facilitate this co-operation, Corps Headquarters was put in
direct touch with the Royal Navy and with Bomber Command. In the
event of these attacks and the preliminary efforts of the ground
forces having no effect the assault was to take place on 8 or 9
September, depending on the administrative situation and the
amount of information obtained.2
Defences
Le Havre was strongly defended and surrounded by water on three
sides (the English Channel to the west, the mouth of the Seine River
to the south, and the flooded Lezarde River valley to the east).
Strong defensive works strengthened these natural obstacles, and the
obvious route for a land assault - the north - was under observation
from high ground around Octeville as well as two high plateaux to
the north-east. Barbed wire and minefields protected an area from
the Lezarde valley at La Rive to the sea coast at Octeville. A
20-foot wide anti-tank ditch, about 10 feet deep, had also been dug
on the northern approaches to the city and concrete emplacements
housing machine guns and anti-tank weapons were numerous, 11 on the
northern plateau alone. Inside the city were 28 artillery positions,
usually of four guns each, though the majority could only be trained
out to sea. Two forts inside the city (Fort Ste Adresse and Fort
Saniv) were combined with road blocks, pill boxes, fortified houses,
and concrete shelters to form an interlocking defensive system. The
garrison was estimated at between 7,350 and 8,700 men, including
4,000 artillerymen and flak troops and 1,300 naval personnel
untrained in ground combat. Infantry number 4,500 men according to
post-war interrogations of the garrison commander, including a
battalion of Grenadier Regiment 936 of Infanterie Division 245.3
Battle-experienced men on
leave from the eastern front, hastily banded together into two
battalions, had not yet shaken down into a smooth-working team.
The men of 81 Fortress Unit, and two battalions of 5 Sicherungs
Regiment (Protective Regiment) were infirm and of small fighting
value. The fortress commander having considered the quality of
his troops and the facilities for defence, had reported to the
Commander of Fifteenth Army, so he alleged later, that the
fortress could be held against an assault for 24 hours in
unfavourable circumstances, or 72 hours if circumstances
favoured the defence.4
Fire Support
Preparation for the battle included naval bombardment and tactical
mission by heavy bombers. The chief effects of the shelling and
bombing was to knock out two anti-aircraft batteries, damage the
telephone exchange, and make streets impassable due to rubble. Some
922,000 leaflets were also dropped on the city by RAF aircraft and
artillery shells. Propaganda missions were also executed by
loudspeaker.
A tremendous
weight of artillery was available to support the attack. In
addition to the six field regiments of the two divisions, there
were two AGRA's, comprising six medium and two heavy regiments.
Besides timed concentrations, the corps commander could order,
and divisions could request, Victor Targets. When one of these
was ordered by the CCRA, every gun which could reach the target,
and was not otherwise engaged, would take part in the shoot. The
call to fire on a Victor Target took precedence over
counter-battery or counter-flak tasks. Pre-arranged
concentrations were also available on call.
|
Canadian
Participation
1 Canadian Armoured Personnel Carrier
Squadron had been formed on 1 Sep 44 as the result of the success
which attended the use of "unfrocked Priests" carrying infantry
during Operations TOTALIZE and TRACTABLE. The squadrons had 4 troops
each of 12 Kangaroos. This squadron and its successor, 1 Canadian
Armoured Personnel Carrier Regiment, (formed 23 Oct 44) were to
provide a satisfactory solution to the problem of transporting
infantry safely through the enemy's outer defences.
The first phase of the assault
planned by Lieutenant General Sir John Crocker, commander of I
British Corps, called for the 49th Division to breach the outer
defences and capture the northern plateau while seizing a bridgehead
on the southern plateau. The second phase would see the 51st
Division secure a base north of the Foręt de Mongeon while 49th
Division seized the southern plateau. The Highlanders would then
destroy defences at Octeville and secure the northwestern outskirts
of Le Havre itself. The final phase would see both divisions
attacking from the captured high ground into the city itself. |
British Churchill crews of the 34th
Tank Brigade watch the aerial bombardment of Le Havre. IWM Photo. |
The initial task of 49 (W.R.) Inf
Div in the first phase was to breach and enter the enemy defences at
a point a mile west of Montiville. Here it would be necessary to
make three gaps through wire and minefield and, in the case of the
central passage, bridge the anti-tank ditch. For the task, 56 Inf
Bde had flails to deal with mines, AVsRE for the bridging of the
ditch, and the Churchills of 7 R. Tks. To deal with the strongpoints
behind the enemy minefields and wire, they had more AVsRE and
Crocodile flamethrowing tanks. The battalion whose task it was to
pass through the northern plateau and secure a bridgehead on the
southern plateau, had Churchills in support, plus the very great
advantage of being carried to their objectives in the
Canadian-manned Kangaroos.
In the second
phase, 51 (H.) Inf Div was to start its operations in darkness, with
a break-in just west of the gaps made earlier by 49 (W.R.) Inf Div.
For their part in the assault the Scotsmen also received the
assistance of the strange contrivances of 79 Armd Div. The gap was
to be three lanes in width, and each lane was to be made by an
identical armoured column, or "gapping team". The leading vehicle
was an AVRE, whose principal function was to clear the anti-landing
poles and wires which infested the area. Next came the first
"flail", whose responsibility included direction keeping by gyro
compass, an important and difficult task at night, as had been found
in Operation TOTALIZE. There would follow two AVsRE. with "snakes"
for detonating by explosives the mines on the far side of the
trench, and so giving the four flails which followed a clear area
from which to start their work of mine detonation. The last two
vehicles would be an A.V.R.E. towing a sledge full of fascines for
use by the divisional sappers and a bulldozer to improve the
crossings. As in Operation TOTALIZE, direction-keeping was to be
aided by tapes and lights, and Bofors tracers.
Bad weather hampered planning, and
frequent rain caused mud that made passage of vehicles difficult.
The operation was postponed from 9 Sep to 10 Sep, though the ground
remained a concern to commanders in the event.
The Battle
The opening bombardment began at 1000hrs on 10 Sep, with 300 15-inch
shells falling on the city. At 1645hrs, 900 heavy bombers dropped
4,264 tons of high explosive.
To the waiting troops, formed
up west of Montivilliers on the right bank of the Lezarde, the
weight and apparent precision of the bombing was impressive and
encouraging. They estimated that its effects on the defenders
would be considerable. Prisoners stated subsequently, however,
that although the bombardment was very frightening,
comparatively few of the German troops were killed or wounded
because of the excellent shelters, including those supplied for
the civilian population. Damage was done to weapons, but the
most important result was the breakdown in communications, which
prevented the German artillery commander from controlling his
resources, and precluded centralized direction of the defence.
The 49th Division advanced at
1745hrs, and flail tanks began clearing mines from the left gap at
1825hrs, managing to clear three lanes by 1940hrs with the loss of
four tanks. The centre attack went slowly, as it involved bridging
the anti-tank ditch, and only one lane was cleared despite great
effort. The assault on the eastern gap, also, resulted in just one
line rather than the planned two. In all, 29 flail tanks were put
out of action as well as two command tanks - almost all disabled by
mines - and six AVsRE.
The German
view of this part of the operation is interesting as showing the
effectiveness of the methods employed by the attackers:
During the night 10/11 September, Allied artillery kept up its
intensive fire. In addition a dome of light formed by huge
searchlights was thrown over the fortress, and under this
artificial moonlight infantry and flame-throwing tanks continued
their break-in all through the night. Command during the hours
of darkness was almost impossible with means of communication,
wireless and roads, hopelessly damaged. Companies thrown in for
relief reached their assembly points late, and with considerable
casualties. When daylight came, Wildermuth realized a
counter-attack was out of the question, and he ordered his
troops to take up the defence of the second position, on the
east and north-east edge of the forest of Mongeon...
Minefields were penetrated very quickly, and Allied tanks and
infantry co-operated well in the attack. The flame-throwing
tanks had a great morale effect in weakening the defenders' will
to resist. The artificial moonlight on the night of 10/11
September, created considerable surprise. Preceding the attack
into the town, Allied artillery gave prompt and mobile support
to the spearheads of the attack. The infantry advanced carefully
and capably, and the British fighter, according to Wildermuth,
proved himself to be a hard fighter in the break-in and in
house-to-house fighting.
Once the gaps had been cleared,
however, tanks and Crocodile flamethrowing tanks passed through to
engage enemy fortifications. As fighting broke out across the
northern plateau past sundown, "The battalion whose task it was to
seize a bridgehead on the southern plateau were forced to advance on
foot from the gaps as the going, because of mud and undetonated
mines, was too bad for the Canadian-manned Kangaroos which were
carrying them to proceed further." Unable to establish a bridgehead,
this force did manage to seize two intact bridges over the Fontaine
(dividing the plateaux) and Royal Engineers completed two other
crossings.
At 2359hrs the 51st Division's leading battalions passed through the
right hand gap of the 49th, and manoeuvred to the rear of enemy
defences opposite their division; then the Highlanders began their
own gapping work. By 0240hrs, three lanes had been started, and
bridges laid over the ditch. The first lane was completed two hours
later.
11 Sep 1944
To the east of the Lezarde, a brigade of the 49th Division attacked
four strong points east of Harfleur at 0530hrs on 11 Sep; the attack
was supported by tanks and flails and the fire of four field
regiments and one medium regiment. Despite this support, unexpected
mines hampered the assault, and the addition of Crocodiles to the
attack force did not immediately deter the German defenders;
fighting lasted until after 1400hrs when the the last strongpoint
surrendered. By last light the brigade was moving westward into the
city itself, and reached a point northwest of the railway
marshalling yards.
In the meantime, attacks from the north had penetrated further into
German defences, and concrete emplacements were reduced by flame and
explosives from Crocoiles and AVsRE. Bomber Command dropped 857 more
tons of bombs early in the morning and tactical air support engaged
targets throughout during the daylight hours, which saw troops reach
Doudenville, and into the city as far south as the forts Ste
Addressee and Sanvic.
|
12 Sep 1944
The final clearance of the city was
effected on 12 Jul 1944; a brigade of the 51st Division cleared the
area from Doudenville to the coast with little resistance, while the
other two brigades of the division cleared Le Havre's southern
portion including Fort Ste Addresse which stubbornly held out until
1500hrs. The 49th Division cleared areas in the south including the
docks and Canal Vauban as well as Fort Sanvic. The 49th also
captured Oberst Wildermuth, who had been wounded.
In 48 hours'
fighting the great fortress of Le Havre had been reduced. The
port was thus secured for our use 98 days after the first
invaders landed in German-occupied Europe. The besiegers
suffered just under 500 casualties killed, wounded and missing
from 3 Sep to the end of the operation on 12 Sep. On the other
hand the defence had cost the Germans 11,300 prisoners, as well
as uncounted dead. An official report on the battle lists the
dominant factors which led to the British success.
|
French citizens assist
British armoured reconnaissance troops locate German holdouts during
mopping-up operations, 12 Sep 1944. IWM Photo. |
There is no doubt
that the speed and comparative ease with which the operation was
accomplished were largely due to the absence of a determined will to
resist on the part of the garrison, and that this condition was created
by a sense of complete isolation by land, sea and air, culminating in
the concentrated and undisturbed bombardment of the defences by the
Royal Artillery, the Royal Navy and above all, the Royal Air Force. The
Corps plan, both in its conception and execution, made full use of this
condition; all available arms were employed to their best advantage; the
momentum of the assault was never permitted to relax; before it had time
to recover the garrison was overwhelmed.
The German view is also presented in the
CMHQ report:
Colonel Wildermuth gave, from the
German viewpoint, a studied and logical evaluation of the
comparative contributions of the various arms and services in our
conduct of the battle of Le Havre:
Describing Allied tactics, he claimed that the main brunt of the
attack had been delivered against the weakest part of the land
front. That this would come on 10 September, was hardly to be
doubted in consideration of what had gone before. That the attack
would start after 1730 hrs, however, came as something of a
surprise. The air bombardments and the shelling from the sea had
only a general destructive effect, but did not create much military
damage. The real effective fire came from Allied concentrated
artillery which had devastating results in knocking out the guns of
the fortress.
Aftermath
Le Havre, once captured, was assigned to US forces as planned, and made
the task of capturing other Channel Ports that much more important to
the commander of 21st Army Group and his subordinate commanders.
Boulogne was particularly needed as a terminal for "Pluto", the
crosschannel pipe line. But progress had been made, for the fall of Le
Havre released to II Canadian Corps the strong body of armour and
artillery required by 3 Cdn Inf Div to assault Boulogne. It also made
available the resources of RAF Bomber Command and the guns of 51 (H.)
Inf Div and 9 AGRA. On 13 Sep General Crerar, in a directive to his
Corps Commanders, in which he outlined the future requirements to be
carried out by First Cdn Army in the clearing of channel ports and the
opening of Antwerp, gave orders that 2 Cdn Corps should capture Boulogne
on 16 Sep, "or as soon thereafter as the necessary air support can be
afforded.
Battle Honours
The following Canadian units were awarded the Battle Honour "Le
Havre"
for participation in these actions:
British 79th Armoured Division
Notes
-
Detailed discussion of major points of this article, including
primary reference material footnotes, can be found in Report No.
184, Historical Section, Canadian Military Headquarters reports:
"Canadian Participation in the Operations in North-West Europe 1944.
Part V: Clearing the Channel Ports 3 Sep 44 - 6 Feb 45." These
reports are available in electronic form online.
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
The CMHQ report states "GR 36" which is presumed to be a
typographical error (there are other more obvious errors in the
report).
- Ibid.
All further quotations are from CMHQ report 184 unless noted
otherwise.
|