History |
Wars & Campaigns |
►Boer
War
►First
World War
►►Western
Front
►►►Trench
Warfare: 1914-1916
►►►Allied
Offensive: 1916
►►►Allied
Offensives: 1917
►►►German
Offensive: 1918
►►►Advance
to Victory: 1918
►►Siberia
►Second
World War
►►War
Against Japan
►►North
Africa
►►Italian
Campaign
►►►Sicily
►►►Southern
Italy
►►►The
Sangro and Moro
►►►Battles
of the FSSF
►►►Cassino
►►►Liri
Valley
►►►Advance
to Florence
►►►Gothic
Line
►►►Winter
Lines
►►North-West
Europe
►►►Normandy
►►►Southern
France
►►►Channel
Ports
►►►Scheldt
►►►Nijmegen
Salient
►►►Rhineland
►►►Final
Phase
►Korean
War
►Cold
War
►Gulf
War |
Operations |
|
Battle Honours |
Boer War
First World War
Western Front
Trench Warfare: 1914-1916
Allied Offensive: 1916
►Somme, 1916 |
1
Jul-18 Nov 16 |
►Albert |
.1-13
Jul 16 |
►Bazentin |
.14-17
Jul 16 |
►Pozieres |
.23
Jul-3 Sep 16 |
►Guillemont |
.3-6
Sep 16 |
►Ginchy |
.9
Sep 16 |
►Flers-Courcelette |
15-22
Sep 16 |
►Thiepval |
26-29
Sep 16 |
►Le Transloy |
.
1-18 Oct 16 |
Allied
Offensives: 1917
►Arras 1917 |
8
Apr-4 May 17 |
►Vimy, 1917 |
.9-14
Apr 17 |
►Arleux |
28-29 Apr 17 |
►Scarpe, 1917 |
.3-4
May17 |
►Hill 70 |
.15-25
Aug 17 |
►Messines, 1917 |
.7-14
Jun 17 |
►Ypres, 1917 |
..31
Jul-10 Nov 17 |
►Pilckem |
31
Jul-2 Aug 17 |
►Langemarck, 1917 |
.16-18
Aug 17 |
►Menin Road |
.20-25
Sep 17 |
►Polygon Wood |
26
Sep-3 Oct 17 |
►Broodseinde |
.4
Oct 17 |
►Poelcapelle |
.9
Oct 17 |
►Passchendaele |
.12
Oct 17 |
►Cambrai, 1917 |
20
Nov-3 Dec 17 |
German Offensive: 1918
►Somme, 1918 |
.21
Mar-5 Apr 18 |
►St. Quentin |
.21-23
Mar 18 |
►Bapaume, 1918 |
.24-25
Mar 18 |
►Rosieres |
.26-27
Mar 18 |
►Avre |
.4
Apr 18 |
►Lys |
.9-29
Apr 18 |
►Estaires |
.9-11
Apr 18 |
►Messines, 1918 |
.10-11
Apr 18 |
►Bailleul |
.13-15
Apr 18 |
►Kemmel |
.17-19
Apr 18 |
Advance to Victory: 1918
►Arras, 1918 |
.26
Aug-3 Sep 18 |
►Scarpe, 1918 |
26-30 Aug 18. |
►Drocourt-Queant |
.2-3
Sep 18 |
►Hindenburg Line |
.12
Sep-9 Oct 18 |
►Canal du Nord |
.27
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►St. Quentin Canal |
.29
Sep-2 Oct 18 |
►Epehy |
3-5
Oct 18 |
►Cambrai, 1918 |
.8-9
Oct 18 |
►Valenciennes |
.1-2
Nov 18 |
►Sambre |
.4
Nov 18 |
►Pursuit to Mons |
.28 Sep-11Nov |
Second World War
War Against Japan
South-East Asia
Italian Campaign
Battle of Sicily
Southern
Italy
The Sangro and Moro
Battles of the FSSF
►Anzio |
22
Jan-22 May 44 |
►Rome |
.22
May-4 Jun 44 |
►Advance
|
.22
May-22 Jun 44 |
to the Tiber |
. |
►Monte Arrestino |
25
May 44 |
►Rocca Massima |
27
May 44 |
►Colle Ferro |
2
Jun 44 |
Cassino
►Cassino II |
11-18
May 44 |
►Gustav Line |
11-18
May 44 |
►Sant' Angelo in
|
13
May 44 |
Teodice |
. |
►Pignataro |
14-15 May 44 |
Liri Valley
►Hitler Line |
18-24 May 44 |
►Melfa Crossing |
24-25 May 44 |
►Torrice Crossroads |
30
May 44 |
Advance to Florence
Gothic Line
►Gothic Line |
25 Aug-22 Sep 44 |
►Monteciccardo |
27-28 Aug 44 |
►Point 204 (Pozzo Alto) |
31 Aug 44 |
►Borgo Santa Maria |
1 Sep 44 |
►Tomba di Pesaro |
1-2 Sep 44 |
Winter Lines
►Rimini Line |
14-21 Sep 44 |
►San Martino- |
14-18 Sep 44 |
San Lorenzo |
. |
►San Fortunato |
18-20 Sep 44 |
►Sant' Angelo |
11-15 Sep 44 |
in Salute |
. |
►Bulgaria Village |
13-14 Sep 44 |
►Pisciatello |
16-19 Sep 44 |
►Savio Bridgehead |
20-23
Sep 44 |
►Monte La Pieve |
13-19
Oct 44 |
►Monte Spaduro |
19-24 Oct 44 |
►Monte San Bartolo |
11-14
Nov 44 |
►Lamone Crossing |
2-13
Dec 44 |
►Capture of Ravenna |
3-4
Dec 44 |
►Naviglio Canal |
12-15 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Vecchio |
16-18 Dec 44 |
►Fosso Munio |
19-21 Dec 44 |
►Conventello- |
2-6 Jan 45 |
Comacchio |
. |
Northwest Europe
Battle of Normandy
►Quesnay Road |
10-11 Aug 44 |
►St. Lambert-sur- |
19-22 Aug 44 |
Southern France
Channel Ports
The Scheldt
Nijmegen Salient
Rhineland
►The
Reichswald |
8-13 Feb 45 |
►Waal
Flats |
8-15 Feb 45 |
►Moyland
Wood |
14-21 Feb 45 |
►Goch-Calcar
Road |
19-21 Feb 45 |
►The
Hochwald |
26
Feb- |
. |
4
Mar 45 |
►Veen |
6-10 Mar 45 |
►Xanten |
8-9
Mar 45 |
Final Phase
►The
Rhine |
23
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
►Emmerich-Hoch
|
28
Mar-1 Apr 45 |
Elten |
. |
Korean War
|
Domestic Missions |
►FLQ
Crisis |
International
Missions |
►ICCS
Vietnam 1973
►MFO
Sinai 1986- |
Peacekeeping |
►UNTEA |
W. N. Guinea 1963-1964 |
►ONUCA |
C. America
1989-1992 |
►UNTAC |
Cambodia
1992-1993 |
►UNMOP |
Prevlaka
1996-2001 |
|
Exercises |
|
Verrières Ridge - Tilly la Campagne
Verrières Ridge - Tilly
la Campagne was a Battle Honour granted to units participating in the
battle to clear this feature during the battles south of Caen, in
particular Operation SPRING, during the Battle of Normandy. This was one
of the battles fought during the initial campaign the
Canadian Army fought in North-West Europe during the Second World War.
Background
General Montgomery, as commander of
21st Army Group responsible for all Allied land forces in Normandy,
issued a directive to his four army commanders on 21 July (including
Bradley of the U.S.1st Army, holding the western half of the bridgehead,
Dempsey, commanding the British 2nd Army in the eastern half, Patton, of
the U.S. 3d Army preparing to become operational pending the American
breakout in Operation COBRA, and Crerar of 1st Canadian Army, also
awaiting its first operational role). The directive noted an improvement
in the general situation on the eastern flank since British offensive
operations on 18 July, a firm bridgehead over the Orne, and the ability
to move east, south-east or south. The directive went on to point out
the necessity of moving the western flank into Cherbourg and the
Brittany peninsula, while strengthening the eastern flank. |
|
At noon on 23 July 1st Canadian Army
became operational, taking over the sector of the 1st British Corps,
whose troops came under command of General Crerar. The British 3rd, 49th
(West Riding), 51st (Highland) and 6th Airborne divisions came under
command, the latter including also the 1st and 4th Special Service
Brigades. Crerar's first task was to advance the left flank of the corps
eastwards beyond the Dives River to remove Ouistreham from the threat of
enemy observation and fire and to enable the use of the port facilities
in Caen. The 2nd British Army was ordered to keep its front active to
lead the enemy to believe a major advance on Falaise/Argentan was
possible, "and he must be induced to build up his main strength to the
east of the R. Orne so that our affairs on the western flank can proceed
with greater speed." An army reserve of a corps containing at least two
armoured divisions was ordered.
The 1st U.S. Army was instructed to
secure the Cherbourg peninsula in its entirety and advance on Brittany,
and in particular the enemy-held ports there. The 3d U.S. Army was to be
prepared to participate in the clearance of Brittany "when so ordered."
U.S. forces had a large offensive code-named COBRA which would be
precipitated by a heavy saturation bombardment by four-engine bombers to
effect a breakthrough.
Montgomery's intentions are
given in rather more detail in a letter which he wrote the Supreme
Commander on 24 July. This explained that his conception of the
Second Army operations was,
first,
an attack by the
2nd Canadian Corps at dawn on 25 July to capture the area Fontenay
le Marmion—Point 122 (a feature on the Falaise road also called the
"Cramesnil spur")—Garcelles-Secqueville;
secondly,
an attack on 28
July by the 12th Corps west of the Orne to capture the area Evrecy—Amaye;
thirdly,
an operation by the 8th Corps
east of the Orne and through the Canadian Corps down the Falaise
road, to cover the capture by the Canadian Corps of a large wooded
area east of Garcelles. Finally,
all these
operations were in Montgomery's mind "preliminary to a very large
scale operation, by possibly three or four armoured divisions",
which he proposed to launch towards Falaise. This was evidently to
be another "Goodwood"; and again the Army Group Commander
emphasized, as he had before that operation, that its results could
not be foretold. If the operation did not go well, it would, he
said, be possible to withdraw into the firm base formed by the
Canadian Corps and repeat it a few days later. He hoped that this
large armoured thrust could go in about 3 or 4 August. While telling
Eisenhower that General Bradley's offensive had been postponed on 24
July because of the weather, and might have to be postponed again
for the same reason, Montgomery added that he was not going to "hold
back or wait" on the eastern flank. He had ordered General Dempsey
to go ahead on 25 July "anyhow", and the 2nd Canadian Corps was
attacking at 3:30 a.m. In the event, both the American "Cobra" and
the more limited Canadian operation ("Spring") went in on the
morning of 25 July.1
The 2nd Canadian Corps thus remained
under control of the 2nd British Army in July, and Operation SPRING was
intended as a springboard for further operations by the Guards Armoured
to seize what had been the objectives initially set for Operation
GOODWOOD - the high ground at Cintheaux and the river crossings at
Bretteville-sur-Laize. Intelligence was poor owing to weather that
prevented photo reconnaissance, and prisoners of the 272nd Infantry
Division spoke of their impression of the July 20 bomb assassination
plot on Hitler but little real data regarding the elements of the 9th SS
and 2nd Panzer Divisions that were in support. General Simonds,
commanding the 2nd Canadian Corps, did believe that a simple repeat of
the attack of 19 July (see the article on St.
André-sur-Orne) would have little chance of succeeding.
Unfortunately, the Canadians had little experience in night fighting,
though the 2nd Division had at least started to study the tactical
problems in 1943.2
German Situation
Study of German records after the war
reveals that the enemy was expecting further attacks on the Caen front;
on 22 July 47th Panzer Corps was directed to deploy the 2nd Panzer
Division to an area north-west of Falaise while the 9th and 10th SS
Panzer Divisions were assembled in a triangle between the Laize and Orne
Rivers. (In the event, the 2nd reached their destination on the night of
25/26 July and the 10th never redeployed at all). As SPRING and COBRA
were about to break, seven German armoured divisions faced the 2nd
British Army, most of them east of the Orne, while two armoured
divisions were present on the American front.
The 2nd Canadian Corps was
confronted by a most formidable array. Under the 1st S.S. Panzer
Corps, the 1st S.S. Panzer Division
(Leibstandarte SS Adolf
Hitler) held the
line from the vicinity of Cagny to Verrières. Thence to the Orne the
272nd Infantry Division was in the front positions, powerfully
reinforced with a tank battalion and a panzer grenadier battalion
each from the 2nd Panzer Division and the 9th S.S. Panzer Division,
plus the reconnaissance battalion of the 10th S.S. Panzer Division.
In close reserve north-west of Bretteville-sur-Laize was the balance
of the 9th S.S., and more distant, north-west of Tournebu, the main
body of the 2nd Panzer. On the opposite flank of the 1st S.S. Panzer
Corps the 116th Panzer Division was waiting in reserve east of St.
Sylvain.6 We did not know the full strength of these dispositions
before the operation, and in particular did not know the 2nd Panzer
had moved east from Caumont; but it was clear, and is still clearer
today, that "Spring" was a very difficult proposition.
The Germans were now for the
first time, many weeks too late for their own good, beginning to
assume that a second Allied landing, in the Pas de Calais area, was
no longer probable. The weekly report of Army Group "B", issued on
24 July for the week ending the previous day, remarked that the
Allies now had at least 40 divisions in the bridgehead, and that
there were still in Great Britain 52 "large formations", of which 42
could be moved to the Continent. These figures were, as always,
greatly exaggerated; there were actually 31 divisions (14 British
and Canadian, 17 U.S.) on the order of battle of the 21st Army Group
on 25 July.8 The report, which was signed by General Speidel, the
Army Group's Chief of Staff, proceeded:
The intentions of Army Group
Montgomery seem to remain unchanged. The 2nd British Army will try
to obtain a breakthrough in the general direction of Falaise in
order to create the conditions required for the thrust on Paris. The
1st American Army will strive to attain its first operational goal:
broadening the lodgement area as far as the line Domfront-Avranches.
There are no indications on
hand regarding the date and target of the 1st American Army Group's
attack. (Note - this is a reference to the fictitious 1st United
States Army Group created in England as a deception, rather than the
impending activation of the 12th U.S. Army Group.) In view of the
continuing movement of forces to the Normandy front [from England] a
far distant landing operation is becoming less probable, but the
15th Army's Somme-Seine sector is still in special danger. The more
and faster Montgomery gains ground from the bridgehead towards the
south, the less probable becomes a landing at a new point by the
forces still in England...3
Planning
Planning for SPRING began when it
became obvious that further progress in the direction of Falaise would
necessitate the need for a deliberate attack. On 21 July the 2nd
Canadian Corps commander, Lieutenant-General Simonds, held a preliminary
"O" Group, and on 23 July, commanders down to the level of brigade
commander were briefed. A final conference attended by all commanders of
the 2nd and 3rd Canadian Infantry Division, as well as British 7th
Armoured and Guards Armoured Divisions, was conducted at noon on 24
July, the latter having been under Simonds' command since 20 July. The
operation instruction was issued by 2nd Canadian Corps after the
conference, with D-Day confirmed for 25 July and H-Hour as 0330hrs.
It is fair to assume (though
it is not recorded) that by this time Montgomery's order had reached
Simonds through Dempsey. The instruction defined the intention as
the capture of the high ground around Point 122; exploitation to
widen the gap and clear the eastern flank by capturing the woods
east of Garcelles; and further exploitation southwards to seize the
high ground about Cintheaux on the Falaise road. This was to be
carried out in three phases, the first being the capture of the line
May-sur-Orne— Verrières—Tilly la Campagne. The second would consist
of the capture of the line Fontenay le Marmion—Rocquan-court (that
is, the ground immediately south of the Verrières Ridge) followed by
that of Point 122. The third phase would be "exploitation as ordered
by Commander 2 Cdn Corps".
This was generally in accord
with General Montgomery's plan as described to the Supreme
Commander. However, General Simonds has stated that in fact the
attainment of these objectives was not considered likely. The
opposing forces were known to be very formidable, and his
understanding was that this was in fact to be simply a "holding
attack" designed to occupy the enemy while the main assault was made
on the American front. But such conceptions could be given no
currency, and however well understood this interpretation of the
forthcoming operation may have been on higher levels, it was not
confided to the divisional commanders.4
The development of the planning had
revolved around the view that the high ground north of Cintheaux was,
according to Simonds, the "key to the German main defence system south
of Caen". Further, it represented
..."the ultimate objective"
and "necessary stepping stone" to continued advance. (Simonds)
further reasoned that the builtup areas of St. André-sur-Orne and
May-sur-Orne to the west offered the best cover for an attack in
which even a partial success might gain the "very important VERRIERS
ridge." It was clear to him, however, that deployment for such an
attack would have to be conducted in darkness and the crest of
Verrières ridge captured before daylight. According to Simonds, his
plan finally "legislated both for success and the lack of it," this
aspect being well-understood by Dempsey (commander of the 2nd
British Army) who had also been advised it was probably too much to
hope for a breakthrough. Bearing in mind that Simonds was roughly
aware of the opposition he faced, this would appear to make sense.
Whereas the dreaded 1st SS Panzer held the front from Verrières
eastward, the 272nd German Infantry Division occupied the area
between there and the Orne. The degree to which the 272nd had been
reinforced by elements of 2nd, 9th SS and 10th SS panzer divisions
does not appear to have been appreciated, however.5
The Plan
During the first phase, the two
Canadian infantry divisions were to secure objectives on the Verrières
Ridge; the 2nd Division to the west assigned May-sur-Orne and Verrières,
and the 3rd Division to the east Tilly-la-Campagne.
In the second phase, the 2nd Division
would continue to Fontenay-le-Marmion and Rocquancourt while the 7th
Armoured Division moved up the middle to take the Cramesnil spur, and
the 3rd Division would follow along to take Garcelles-Secqueville. Both
armoured divisions were to stand by for possible further exploitation,
with the Guards Armoured tasked to secure the woods east of Garcelles.
Visibility was to be enhanced by use of "artificial moonlight", or
searchlight beams reflected off of low cloud.
The simpler task was that of the 3rd
Canadian Division, whose 9th Infantry Brigade was to be support by MMGs,
heavy mortars, anti-tank guns, artillery and tanks.
The North Nova Scotia
Highlanders, advancing from Bouguébus covered by the divisional
artillery, would assault Tilly-la-Campagne. Assuming the success of
this thrust, and of the 7th Armoured Division's to the Cramesnil
spur, The Highland Light Infantry of Canada were to go through and
take Garcelles-Secqueville.The 7th Infantry Brigade was available
for exploitation, and the 8th was in reserve. The division's
objective in the exploitation phase was the village of La Hogue. The
left flank was to be secured by the 27th Armoured Brigade of the 1st
British Corps, which was to be placed behind the 3rd Canadian
Division.
The 2nd Canadian Division
attack was somewhat more complicated. The road from St. Andre-sur-Orne
to Hubert-Folie was to be the start line, but it still remained to
be cleared. This task was allocated to the 6th Infantry Brigade, to
be completed by midnight 24-25 July. To carry out this intention,
Brigadier Young ordered the Camerons of Canada to expel the enemy
from St. Andre and St. Martin de-Foutenay, and Les Fusiliers
Mont-Royal to take Troteval Farm. The division's main attack was to
be made on a two-brigade front, the 5th Infantry Brigade being on
the right with the Camerons of Canada under command, and the 4th
Infantry Brigade on the left with Les Fusiliers Mont-Royal under
command. On the right The Calgary Highlanders were to advance from
St. Andre to capture May-sur-Ome. Simultaneously The Royal Hamilton
Light Infantry of the 4th Brigade would pass through Les Fusiliers
Mont-Royal to take Verrières. The units of all three brigades not
involved in the main attack (The South Saskatchewan Regiment, The
Essex Scottish Regiment and Le Regiment de Maisonneuve) were to be
in reserve under the 6th Brigade. The 22nd Armoured Brigade of the
7th Armoured Division would move up from Ifs to guard against any
armoured counter-attack while the 2nd Division was attacking
Fontenay-le-Marmion and Rocquancourt, and to be in readiness to go
forward against the Cramesnil spur. The second phase of the 2nd
Division attack was to begin at 5:30 a.m., with the Canadian Black
Watch, with a tank squadron from the 6th Armoured Regiment,
attacking Fontenay on the Orne flank and The Royal Regiment of
Canada pushing through Verrières to take Rocquancourt.6
A large artillery support program was
devised for the attack, with the divisional artilleries of both the 2nd
and 3rd Divisions augmented by the British 25th Field Regiment and the
19th Field Regiment, RCA as well as three corps-level artillery
formations (2nd Canadian Army Group Royal Artillery and the 3rd and 8th
Army Groups Royal Artillery.) The weather was not a consideration and
therefore air support was considered a "bonus"; in any event heavy
bombers were being employed on the American front for COBRA. Medium
bombers available to support SPRING were directed to bomb on red smoke
shells fired to mark targets by Canadian artillerymen. These targets
included the woods east of Garcelles at 2120hrs on 24 July (with a
number of bombs having delayed-action fuses set for 0630hrs the next
day) and again at 0730hrs on the 25th. Aircraft of the Royal Air Force
were also instructed to fly "armed reconnaissance" over the battle area
at first light on the 25th to interdict approaching forces or enemy
leaving the target areas in the woods.
The Attack
Heavy anti-aircraft fire rendered the
air attack on 24 July mostly ineffective, and only 15 of the 60 aircraft
dispatched bombed the target. That evening, the 6th Brigade started the
process of clearing the start-line for the 2nd Division. On the eastern
sector of the divisional front, a company of Les Fusiliers Mont-Royal
took Troteval Farm with artillery, heavy mortar and tank support from
The Sherbrooke Fusilier Regiment.
To the west, The Queen's Own Cameron
Highlanders of Canada, supported also by tanks of The Sherbrooke
Fusilier Regiment, became embroiled in confused fighting in the built-up
area of St. Andre-sur-Orne and St. Martin-de-Fontenay, where iron mines
and quarries magnified the defensive strength of the area. The Germans
also made use of a mineshaft in a group of buildings dubbed "the
Factory" due south of St. Andre, which connected directly with an
extensive set of underground works. Other tunnels and air shafts led to
the surface and one underground passage connected Rocquancourt with May-sur-Orne.
The sum effect was to give the Germans the ability to redeploy men and
weapons along the front under solid cover and out of sight, and to
re-occupy positions even once they had been taken.
A further hindrance to operations was
the fact that while Maltot had fallen to British troops, the Germans
still occupied Hill 112 and other heights west of the Orne River,
permitting flanking fire on Canadians maneuvering along the east bank.
The Camerons found these conditions especially trying, and reported the
"partial capture" of St. Martin shortly after midnight, and the
start-line secure by 03:30hrs. In actual fact, resistance continued
afterwards.
Operation SPRING 25 July 1944
Operation "Spring": The 3rd
Division Front
The bombing mission on the woods at
La Hogue was executed by 74 medium bombers between 06:12 and 08:30hrs,
and though it was believed damage had been inflicted to enemy forces
believed to be using the forest for shelter, it had no effect on the
outcome of the ground attack which had already been held up along the
front.
The North Nova Scotia Highlanders
attacked Tilly-la-Campagne with three companies; "B" and "D" went
forward east of a track leading from Bouguébus into Tilly, and "C"
Company went in to the west of the track.
It was planned to provided
some minimal illumination through 'Monty's Moonlight', shining
searchlights on the clouds, yet not with sufficient illumination to
provide the enemy with easy targets. The light would be sufficient
to enable the men to keep station in relation to each other as they
advanced. They were not yet aware that awaiting them in Tilly were
veterans from the Russian Front, members of the 1st SS Panzer LAH.
Untersturmführer Gerhard Stiller commanded a platoon of four tanks
in the village but with a total of twenty tanks within easy call.
While these were the long-serving Mk IV tank, smaller than Tigers or
Panthers, they had an upgraded 75 mm gun, still more powerful than
the normal Sherman 75 mm. With their low profiles the Mk IVs were
lethal against infantry. Pits had been dug at strategic points in
the rubble of Tilly so that the tanks could fire hull-down in the
ground. They would be at a considerable advantage against high
profile Shermans advancing across open ground. In support, infantry
of 272nd Division were well sheltered in the machine-gun pits and
cellars of Tilly.7
Canadian infantryman during Operation
SPRING. Library and Archives Canada photo
The searchlights did not come on at
H-Hour as planned, but came on during the advance; the commander of the
North Novas complained later that they served to silhouette the
attacking troops to the Germans, bringing down heavy MG fire (reports
from the 2nd Division were more favourable regarding the use of
artificial moonlight). Nonetheless, "C" Company managed to establish
itself just to the north of Tilly with few losses.
"B" and "D", on the contrary,
became fiercely engaged with enemy infantry whom our barrage
had not subdued and who "shot and shouted and threw grenades like wild men".
Although the companies got a foothold in an orchard at the north-east comer of the village
and in the village itself, they could not clear the place. "A" Company, the reserve, was now
sent forward to reinforce "C" and attack the village from the western flank. The attempt,
however, caused heavy casualties and this company itself was pinned down. Contact with the
battalion command post near the start-line was almost entirely lost and effective
control within the assaulting companies was virtually impossible.
For a time the C.O. believed that "B"
and "D" Companies were on their objectives, and at 5:25 he reported this. As the
situation became clearer, at 6:14 he asked brigade headquarters for help from the tank
squadron of the 10th Canadian Armoured Regiment (Fort Garry Horse) which was waiting
to support The Highland Light Infantry of Canada in the next phase. This was granted.
In the meantime, Bren carriers and several self-propelled anti-tank guns were sent forward.
They suffered heavy losses without improving the situation; and when "B"
Squadron of the 10th Armoured Regiment moved up it met Panther tanks and
anti-tank guns. It deployed to the west of the village and attempted to
shoot the infantry into it. The squadron itself, however, was shortly
cut to pieces, losing 11 tanks. In the afternoon the remnant was given
permission to retire to Bouguébus, whence it continued to give what
supporting fire it could. The Highlanders' Commanding Officer had
wireless contact with only one of his forward companies ("C"). By this
means he ordered his men to dig in and hold on where they were. This
order can actually have reached few of the soldiers scattered in the
fire-swept fields in and around the outskirts of the village, but most
of them acted independently along the same line. In
the afternoon the C.O. passed the word for the men remaining in the
Tilly area to make their way back to Bouguébus when darkness fell.
Approximately 100 all ranks got back in this manner. In the early
morning of the 26th the Officer Commanding "A" Company returned with nine men. He reported that he thought
small groups were still holding out in various parts of the village, but
that the enemy had moved at least ten tanks and two infantry companies
into the area, and that "it was very unlikely that any of the others
would get out alive".8
After the failure of the attack and
consultation among divisional command staff, The Stormont, Dundas and
Glengarry Highlanders were warned to reinforce the North Novas, but the
order was never given "presumably because it was felt that they would
accomplish little" according to the official Army history. The
battalion's war diarist confided relief and confessed the need for a
rest after long periods in the line since D-Day. The North Novas lost 61
killed, 46 wounded and surrendered 32 prisoners to the 1st SS.9
Both the North Novas and the SDG, along with the 9th Brigade, had their
commanders replaced following the attack.
Simonds, sitting back at Corps
HQ, believed until late afternoon of the second day that the
operation was proceeding according to plan. Keller (commander of the
3rd Canadian Division) and Foulkes (commanding the 2nd) were equally
out of touch with the reality of the situation on their divisional
fronts. When everything appeared hopeless, Brigadier Cunningham
(commanding the 9th Brigade), Lieutenant-Colonel Petch of the North
Novies and Lieutenant-Colonel Christiansen of the Stormont, Dundas
and Glengarry Highlanders confronted Keller with the scope of their
disaster and the futility of continuing the attack. Harsh words were
exchanged.
Brigadier Young (of the 2nd
Division) delivered the same information to General Foulkes -
although without the same degree of forcefulness used by the 3rd
Division's battlefield commanders. Foulkes agreed. Once Simonds
possessed all the facts, he went to the Army Commander and
recommended that the operation be called off. The debacle came as a
bitter blow to his prestige, and he blamed himself for not keeping
closer tabs on the battle as it developed.
In the wake of the operation's
failure, Cunningham, Petch and Christiansen were sacked. Simonds
wanted leaders the troops would follow, not commanders who simply
issued orders expecting them to be obeyed.10
Historian John English expanded on
the fate of the three commanders in his treatise on Canadians in the
Normandy campaign. He noted that a major lesson learned by 3rd Canadian
Division was the launching of attacks along broad frontages, which
required the German defenders to disperse defensive fires and prevent
the build-up of defences in depth. Attacking by battalions singly or in
pairs permitted enemy divisional artillery and mortars as well as AFVs
to be concentrated quickly at the point of attack, and for neighbouring
enemy units to bring down enfilading fire, if they too were not engaged
simultaneously. According to English, "This is what appears to have
happened in the attack upon Tilly-la-Campagne, which action subsequently
became tactically contentious." The SDG had been advised it was being
left out of the battle because it had previously "had no rest" and their
order to stand down after being warned to reinforce the North Novas was
apparently the result of the argument between Cunningham, Petch,
Christiansen and the divisional commander, Keller. The evening after the
argument, Keller and Simonds discussed the matter and Simonds convened a
board of enquiry to investigate the failure of The North Nova Scotia
Highlanders to take Tilly. The board completed its work on 29 July;
Brigadier Cunningham was sent to Canada to become commandant of Kingston
staff courses. Petch was also removed, but Christiansen remained, until
sending a letter on 3 August to Keller in which he admitted that he
would refuse in future to send his battalion into action under certain
circumstances.11
Operation "Spring": The 2nd
Division Front
Lieutenant-Colonel J.M. Rockingham
was not happy with the plan for his battalion, The Royal Hamilton Light
Infantry.
"We were promised that (the
start-line) would be cleared before dark on the night of the 24th,"
he wrote later. "Feeling that this was a bit risky and late, I asked
to be given the task of securing the line myself but was not allowed
to..."
The Fusiliers
Mont-Royal...made a good start by taking (Troteval Farm), and
shortly before darkness fell the (R.H.L.I.) received a message that
their start-line was secure. Rockingham was still dubious. His plan
was for B Company to be the centre of the attacking force with A to
the right and D, plus one platoon of C, to the left. The rest of C
Company would be held in reserve. The Carrier Platoon was to provide
flank protection and the mortars were to be set up behind B
Company's "forming-up" area. The scouts, under Lieutenant Hugh
Hinton, went forward to begin taping the line, axis of attack and
company positions. Rockingham waited, fearing the worst. Well before
midnight a scout came back with the word. Enemy troops and at least
three Panther tanks were holding the assigned start-line.12
Rockingham requested a delay to their
start and mounted an attack with the reserve company in order to drive
the tanks away. PIAT teams managed to do that, though "C" Company lost
its officer commanding, who was killed during the fighting. The
battalion crossed the start line for its attack at 04:10hrs, without
benefit of the timed barrage due to the delay, and came under fire from
machine guns, some of which were found later to have been tank-mounted
weapons. Four tanks were destroyed by a 17-pounder anti-tank gun
detachment of the 2nd Anti-Tank Regiment, RCA located at Troteval Farm.
Medium artillery concentrations assisted flanking companies to get
forward and the centre company to break into the village of Verrières,
which was then counter-attacked by tanks. PIATs were again employed to
resist this counter-attack, and the village was declared to be firmly
held at 07:50hrs. The attack was carried forward, with support from the
7th Armoured Division, towards Rocquancourt, and reached a point 400
yards south of Verrières by 09:30hrs where the Royals were stopped by
heavy fire. "C" Company suffered especially heavy losses. To their
right, the 1st Royal Tank Regiment was stopped by German anti-tank guns
sited north of Rocquancourt, and 30 German tanks were reported hull-down
on a ridge between Fontenay and Rocquancourt, as well as north-east of
Rocquancourt.13
The situation on the 5th Brigade front was
confused from the beginning. Even the front line was in doubt; brigade
headquarters staff sent to set up a tactical HQ in St. André, thinking
it secure, found German soldiers in a house they were to occupy. The
brigadier tried to inform the divisional commander that St. André was
not in fact secure any more than St. Martin was, and requested the
Maisonneuves be released from divisional reserve to clear the start line
for The Calgary Highlanders. The divisional commander insisted that St.
André was under control of the Cameron Highlanders, who in reality were
under constant mortar fire and a stream of infiltrations and German
counter-attacks. A heated discussion followed, and the Camerons were
eventually allocated to the 5th Brigade to clear the start line, and
proceeded with this duty on the night of the 24th, only hours before
Operation SPRING was to start.14
The useful initial progress made on
the left of the 2nd Division front had little parallel on the right. The
Calgary Highlanders, attacking at H Hour in the hope of capturing May
but finding the start-line not clear, had trouble from the beginning. It
seems evident that elements of the battalion did fight their way into
the northern outskirts of May twice during the morning, but were both
times pushed out, retiring to the vicinity of St. Andre. The unit suffered
heavily. Bad wireless communication prevented the Commanding Officer
(Lt.-Col. D. G. MacLauchlan) from getting a clear picture of the
positions of his companies or exercising effective control. The
failure to clear May, and the continued presence of enemy elements in
and about St. Andre and St. Martin and beyond the Orne, meant that the
right flank of the subsequent Black Watch attack against Fontenay would
be badly exposed, while the left would be under fire from the ridge.15
Canadian infantry move up during
Operation SPRING. Library and Archives Canada photo
The attack of the Black Watch has
garnered much attention, due to the devastating losses it incurred. The
official Army history succinctly describes it as such:
At 3:30 a.m. the Black Watch moved
into a forward assembly area in St. Martin. They found that there were
still enemy in the village, and time was lost in clearing it in the
darkness. During this process the Commanding Officer, Lt.-Col. S. S. T.
Cantlie, was mortally wounded by machine-gun fire. The same burst
wounded the senior company commander, and the command devolved upon
Major F. P. Griffin. It was now too late to carry out the attack
according to the original time-table, which called for artillery support
at fixed times. Pending the making of a new plan coordinated with the
artillery and tanks Major Griffin moved the battalion into St. Andre. He
also sent a patrol to reconnoitre May. It entered the place and got the
impression that it was not strongly held by the Germans. It appears,
however, that the latter were merely reserving their fire for a better
target.
Since it was considered essential to
push the attack, Headquarters 5th Infantry Brigade at 6:47 a.m. ordered
the Black Watch to do so. Major Griffin held an "orders group" to issue
instructions for the attack, and arranged for assistance from the
artillery and from the tank squadron of the 6th Armoured Regiment* which
was supporting the battalion. In accordance with the plan thus made, the
Black Watch advanced at 9:30 from the so-called "Factory" south of St.
Martin across the open fields and the west end of the ridge directly
against Fontenay. It had already had a good many casualties and it is
reported that one company was now commanded by a sergeant. From the
moment of crossing the start-line the battalion came under intense and
accurate fire from the ridge, from May, and from the positions beyond
the Orne; and men fell fast. The Black Watch
nevertheless advanced with unwavering determination. Surviving officers
believe that about 60 all ranks, led by Major Griffin, reached the flat
top of the ridge. It appears that on or just beyond the crest they ran
into a well-camouflaged enemy position strengthened with dug-in tanks.
What remained of the battalion was
now "pinned down" by intense close range fire. Further advance being out
of the question, Griffin ordered his men to make their way back
individually as best they could; but very few succeeded in doing so.
Officers of the battalion estimate that the four rifle companies
committed to this attack numbered perhaps 300 officers and men, and that
not more than 15 of them got back to our lines. The last survivors were
probably overwhelmed early in the afternoon. When we later reoccupied the position, Major Griffin's body
was found lying among those of his men.
From the moment when the attack went
in there had been no communication with the battalion. The one wireless
set known to have been with Major Griffin was in a jeep which was later
found knocked out not far from the start-line; and the intensity of the
fire made contact by runner virtually impossible. Brigadier Megill
accordingly remained uncertain as to the unit's fate; artillery tasks,
including the laying of smoke, were fired in the hope of assisting it to
withdraw; and about seven o'clock in the evening Le Regiment de Maisonneuve delivered a further
attack against May-sur-Orne. This also failed; the battalion reported
coming under fire from machine-gunners in its rear who may have
infiltrated through the mine workings.16
The official history reported also that
despite the reports of Black Watch survivors, tank and artillery support
did materialize; the assigned squadron of tanks of the 1st Hussars
entered May-sur-Orne to provide supporting flanking fire, where they
were heavily engaged, losing all three of the troop leaders' tanks to
fire by anti-tank guns and Panther tanks and when no friendly infantry
could be seen, the survivors withdrew, having lost all their officers
during the course of the day. There was a belief by the brigade
commander also that the fire plan of the 5th Field Regiment, RCA was
carried out as planned, but the advance by the Black Watch had been
slowed by enemy fire "to the
point where the battalion was unable to take full advantage of our own
bombardment."17
Historian Terry Copp noted that the
Calgary Highlanders netted a hundred prisoners in their attack on May-sur-Orne
and inflicted other casualties on the German defenders, without actually
taking the objective, and that the Black Watch Forming Up Point and
Start Line were both dominated by mortar and MG fire.
This situation was the result
of divisional headquarters' failure to recognize that St. Martin and
its factory area were well organized, strongly held, defensive
positions. It is clear in hindsight that the first phase of "Spring"
should have been an attack on St. Martin, not May-sur-Orne.18
Suspension of Operations
Communication hampered commanders at
all levels during the battle. Copp cites as an example the Calgary
Highlanders, who failed to provide runners as back-ups for their No. 18
wireless sets which were prone to radio jamming and failure. During the
battle, brigade and divisional headquarters remained unaware of their
situation, and the battalion's C.O. took few steps to ensure proper
communication with his own companies.19 The corps commander,
too, was affected by the flow of information, or lack of it. At 13:00hrs
on the 25th, Simonds visited the British 22nd Armoured Brigade and
concluded that Tilly and May-sur-Orne were to be held, with British
tanks to pass through, despite the fact that in reality, neither
objective had been occupied by Canadian troops during the day. Corps
held out their belief that May-sur-Orne was firmly occupied as late as
16:25hrs. Plans were made at 17:30hrs for an evening attack on
Rocquancourt by the 2nd Division with the entire corps artillery in
support, and at 21:00hrs further attacks on May, followed by
Fontenay-le-Marmion at first light on the 26th. The 9th Brigade was to
secure Tilly during the night.20
All these plans were interrupted by
strong German tank attacks on Verrières at 18:00hrs; German tanks broke
through the R.H.L.I.'s western-most positions.
Nine tanks roared and
clattered through the long wheat towards the ridge, filling the air
with splinters of steel from their machine-guns and blazing away at
both the 6- and 17-pounders with their main armament. This time the
anti-tank guns got the worst of it; the Germans knocked out three
and then continued to spray the area with machine-gun fire, pinning
the RHLI down in their partly-dug foxholes. Some men just stared at
them in frozen fascination but others started organizing
tank-killing parties. Sergeant Tommy MacDonald took a PIAT and half
a dozen men of 11 Platoon and worked his way down the blind side of
a hedgerow on the forward slope, while three Mark IV`s slowly ground
their way up the other side, firing into the barns and houses with
their cannon and sweeping the ground before them with light
automatic fire. MacDonald`s group got one with the PIAT and the
others withdrew. Private Ray Meloche, the PIAT operator in 10
Platoon took off by himself from a trench that was under heavy fire
and crossed thirty yards of open ground to a position from which he
could engage two more Mark IV`s. His first shot knocked out one of
them but immediately afterwards he was seriously wounded by fire
from the other: nevertheless, he continued to fire his PIAT until
it, too, withdrew.21
The battalion continued to fight over
the Verrières position for three days, but continued to hold it in the
face of German counter-attacks, with the assistance of British tanks and
rocket-firing Typhoons, despite one accidental rocket attack on
battalion headquarters due to an errant red smoke target marker. The
R.H.L.I. were, after all was said and done, the only unit of 2nd
Canadian Corps to seize and hold its objectives on 25 July, at a cost
over the three days of fighting of exactly 200 men, including 53 dead.
Not recorded in the official history
is the small part Le Régiment de Maisonneuve played; scheduled to attack
at 19:00hrs, they were permitted to go ahead and ``C`` Company set out
down the road to May-sur-Orne, with ``D`` Company following at H+15,
following a barrage by two regiments of field artillery and four medium
regiments. The enemy was still present in strength in ``The Factory``
and St. André and German fire made movement past the woods north of May
impossible. The Maisonneuve spent the next four days in St. André
holding it and trying to secure St. Martin, their part in the drama of
SPRING having cost them 12 dead and over 40 other losses.22
In the meantime, the divisional
commander had been conferring with his brigadiers; Brigadier Young of
6th Brigade felt that further operations on his front would not be
successful until such time as the Germans west of the Orne had been
cleared. Foulkes agreed and found on meeting with Simonds that the corps
commander agreed with him. On going to the army commander, Simonds was
able to get Dempsey`s approval to cancel the planned attacks for the
morning of the 26th.23
Cost
The 25th had been a bloody day. It is
impossible to give a precise total for the Canadian battle casualties of
Operation "Spring". The official record for the date, for all Canadian
Army units in North-West Europe, shows 1202, of which 362 were fatal. It
is clear, however, that in this instance reporting channels became
clogged and many casualties actually suffered on 25 July were reported
as of later dates. The most extreme case is that of the Canadian Black
Watch, which suffered more heavily than any other unit. Its casualties
recorded under 25 July numbered 167 (83 being fatal).Yet although the battalion was not in
action on 26, 27 or 28 July, 140 additional casualties are recorded for it on
those days. It thus seems evident that the Black Watch actually had 307 casualties on 25
July. Five officers and 118 other ranks were killed or died of wounds. Of the 83 all ranks
who became prisoners, 21 were wounded. Except for the Dieppe operation, there is no
other instance in the Second World War where a Canadian battalion had so many
casualties in a single day. For the infantry battalions of the
2nd Division, and The North Nova Scotia Highlanders, a total of 432
casualties are recorded for 26, 27 and 28 July, 113 being fatal. There were no major operations on
these days, although there was some fighting (particularly in the Verrières
sector) and a good deal of mortaring and shelling. Most of these casualties were certainly
actually suffered on the 25th. We should not be far wrong if we estimated the total battle
casualties of Operation "Spring" at about 1500, and the fatal casualties at about 450.
Again excepting Dieppe, it was the Canadian Army's costliest day of operations in the
Second World War. The 2nd Canadian Corps attack had struck a stone wall. The result is
not surprising, in view of the strength of the German positions and the powerful force of
high-category troops which was holding them. As with "Goodwood", so in the case of
"Spring" the most important matter, in evaluating the operation, is its
effect upon the enemy. It was particularly vital, as we have seen, to prevent him from observing
that the American attack launched west of St. Lo on this same day was in fact the main
Allied effort. It appears that in this respect the operation was useful, although from
the beginning the Germans recognized it as a limited attack.24
Strategic Implications
The Canadian Army`s official
historian suggests that German forces delayed by a period of 48 hours to
redeploy armour from the east to deal with the American offensive in the
west - Operation COBRA - which launched the same day as SPRING. As such,
SPRING formed part of the extended ``holding attack`` that operations
GOODWOOD and ATLANTIC had impressed on the Germans.
Battle Honours
The following Canadian
units were awarded the Battle Honour "Verrières Ridge - Tilly la
Campagne" for participation in
these actions:
2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade
2nd Canadian Division
4th Canadian Infantry Brigade
5th Canadian Infantry Brigade
6th Canadian Infantry Brigade
9th Canadian Infantry Brigade
Notes
-
Stacey, C.P. Official History of
the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Volume III: The Victory
Campaign: The Operations in North-west Europe 1944-45 (Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON, 1960)
-
Copp, Terry The Brigade: The Fifth Canadian
Infantry Brigade 1939-1945 (Fortress Publications, Stoney
Creek, ON, 1992) ISBN 0-919195-16-4 p.67
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Ibid
-
English, John The Canadian Army and the
Normandy Campaign (Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA, 2009)
ISBN 978-0-8117-3576-6 p.187
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Tout, Ken The Bloody Battle for Tilly (Sutton Publishing Ltd., Thrupp, UK, 2000) ISBN 0-7509-2475-6 p.67
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Ibid
-
Foster, Tony Meeting of Generals
(Methuen Publications, Toronto, ON, 1986) ISBN 0-458-80520-3 p.354
-
English, Ibid, p.197. Christiansen was later
recommended to command The West Nova Scotia Regiment; the
recommendation came from Harry Foster, in July 1944 a brigade
commander in the 3rd Canadian Division and in December 1944 the
Major-General in command of the 1st Division. According to English
(p.197) "He was supported in this request by Foulkes who, perhaps in
a backhanded criticism of either Simonds or Keller, claimed to be
'fully aware of [the] circumstances concerning Christiansen['s]
removal.'"
-
Greenhous, Brereton Semper Paratus: The History
of The Royal Hamilton Light Infantry (Wentworth Regiment) 1862-1977
(RHLI Historical Association, 1977) ISBN 0-9690754-0-5
pp.243-244
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Copp, Ibid, p.72
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Ibid
-
Ibid
-
Copp, Ibid, p.75
-
Ibid, p.77
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Greenhous, Ibid, pp.248-249. The Canadian Army`s
official history gives the total number of tanks as eight.
-
Copp, Ibid, pp.82-83
-
Stacey, Ibid
-
Ibid
|